SonicJobs

Published October 19, 2026 by SonicJobs

A candidate asks about the interview process and your careers site is silent. SonicJobs walks through the 2026 fix, from page update to AI visibility check.

This guide covers one complete loop: a candidate question surfaces a content gap, the gap gets fixed on the public careers page, and the updated content is checked for visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. The interview-preparation example used throughout is illustrative, drawn from the kind of pattern regularly surfaced for employers. The guide also covers what to look for in platforms built to support career page visibility in AI answer engines, and how recruiting teams can act on candidate question data without guessing what candidates actually want to know.

---

What a Candidate Question Actually Reveals

When a candidate asks a question on a career site and gets no useful answer, the gap is rarely obvious from the outside. Most career sites do not record what candidates searched for, which questions went unanswered, or where visitors left without applying. That data simply does not exist unless something on the site is built to capture it.

CareerGPT, SonicJobs’ conversational AI career agent, captures exactly this. It records every question a candidate asks, every response it gives, and whether the conversation reached a relevant job or led to an application start. When CareerGPT does not have enough information to answer a question, it tells the candidate so and that gap appears in the employer’s conversation data. Recruiting teams and recruitment marketing managers can review these records, identify the questions that come up repeatedly, and use them to prioritize which content on the career site needs attention.

This is a different category of insight from anything available through standard web analytics. Google shares search terms and volumes through Search Console. AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini share no search data with employers at all. CareerGPT fills that gap specifically for the career site, where candidates are already high intent.

---

The Interview-Preparation Example: One Complete Loop (Illustrative)

The following scenario illustrates the pattern of repeated candidate questions that CareerGPT by SonicJobs surfaces for employers. The employer, InGen Biotech, is fictional.

1The Question Comes In

Multiple candidates visiting InGen Biotech’s career site ask CareerGPT a version of the same question: “What does the interview process look like for clinical roles?” CareerGPT draws on the connected knowledge sources, including the career site and the uploaded job feed, and returns a partial answer. The careers page mentions a two-stage interview process but provides no further detail. CareerGPT tells candidates it lacks enough information to describe what each stage involves.

The question appears repeatedly in InGen’s conversation data. It is not a one-off. It is a signal.

2The Content Gap Is Identified

The recruitment marketing manager reviews the CareerGPT conversation records and finds the interview-process question near the top of unanswered or partially answered queries. She checks the careers page. The “Hiring Process” section reads as follows:

Before (InGen Biotech careers page, “Hiring Process” section)

InGen Biotech uses a two-stage interview process for clinical positions. We look forward to getting to know you.

There is no description of what stage one involves, who conducts it, how long it takes, or what stage two adds. A candidate reading this has the same information they had before they opened the page.

3The Page Gets Updated

The manager works with the clinical recruiting team to document the process and rewrite the section with specific details.

After (InGen Biotech’s careers page, “Hiring Process” section)

Clinical roles at InGen Biotech go through two interview stages. The first is a 30-minute video call with a talent acquisition specialist, focused on your background, availability, and the specific unit you are applying to. The second is an in-person or virtual panel interview with the hiring manager and one or two team members from the department. Most candidates complete both stages within three weeks of applying. You will receive written confirmation of your interview date and a brief overview of what to prepare in advance.

This version answers the question a candidate actually asked. It specifies the format, participants, duration, and timeline.

4CareerGPT Is Updated to Reflect the New Content

Once the page is live, CareerGPT automatically includes the revised page content. CareerGPT can now answer the interview-process question with the specific details candidates were looking for. The next candidate who asks gets a direct, sourced answer, with a link to the updated careers page section.

5Visibility Checks in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude

Updating the page is not the end of the loop. The updated content also needs to be findable when candidates research the employer through AI answer engines before they even reach the career site.

The checks at this stage aren’t straightforward, since ChatGPT is biased. SonicJobs Employer GPT Visibility uses web agents to open each AI assistant and ask specified questions like: “What is the interview process at InGen Biotech Group for clinical roles?” Note what the assistant returns. If the updated page content is indexed and cited, the answer should reflect the new detail. If the assistant returns the old version, or nothing at all, that is a signal that indexing is incomplete or that the page content needs structural changes to be retrievable.

Updating the careers page content doesn’t guarantee visibility in AI answer engines or produce measured gains in citation frequency. We emphasize that content not on a public page cannot be cited by any AI assistant. The update is a necessary condition. Whether and when it surfaces in AI answers depends on indexing, page structure, and how each assistant weights sources, topics covered in the SonicJobs guide on career page structure and retrievability.

---

Why Career Sites Are Producing These Gaps in 2026

The majority of career sites were built around keyword search and job listing display. They were not designed to handle the kind of full-sentence, multi-requirement questions candidates now ask as a matter of habit. Candidates today arrive having already used AI assistants to research roles, companies, and working conditions. They expect to be able to ask follow-up questions and get specific answers.

Many career sites respond to this by doing nothing, or by redirecting candidates to the applicant tracking system (ATS), which is even less equipped to answer a process question. A candidate who reaches a career site directly is already high intent. Leaving that candidate without a specific answer to a concrete question is a measurable drop-off point in the hiring funnel.

CareerGPT addresses this for employers by sitting on the existing career site without requiring a rebuild or an ATS migration. Its function on the content side is to surface which questions candidates are asking, not to produce or publish the answers itself. The content work remains with the recruiting and recruitment marketing team. CareerGPT makes the gap visible and specific.

---

What Good Career Site Content Looks Like for AI Retrievability

AI answer engines cite content that is specific, clearly structured, and directly answers a natural-language question. The InGen Biotech before-and-after above illustrates the difference. The “before” version is not wrong; it is just not useful. The “after” version earns a citation because it answers the question a candidate actually asked.

For talent acquisition (TA) leaders and recruitment marketing teams working through a backlog of content gaps, a few principles apply consistently.

Answer the follow-up, not just the overview. Most careers pages explain that a benefits package exists. Fewer explain what the healthcare deductible is, when 401(k) enrollment opens, or whether dental is included from day one. The overview is not the content that is missing. The specific detail is.

Match the language candidates use. CareerGPT conversation data shows how candidates phrase their questions. “Will I need a degree?” is different from “Education requirements” as a section heading. Pages that use candidate-facing language in headings and copy are more likely to be retrieved when an AI assistant processes a natural-language query.

Keep sections self-contained. An AI assistant citing a specific section of a page does not read the rest of the page for context. Each section of a careers page should stand on its own: who, what, how long, what to expect. Sections that assume the reader has read the previous paragraph will not function well as AI citations.

Use factual specificity as the default. Timelines, formats, team structures, and outcome ranges are all more useful to a candidate and more citable by an AI assistant than vague assurances. “Most candidates hear back within five business days” is citable. “We respond as quickly as possible” is not.

Publish it, do not just upload it. CareerGPT can draw on uploaded documents as knowledge sources for candidates already on the career site. But AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini only cite content that is publicly indexed. If detailed process information exists only in a PDF that is not indexed, it will not appear in external AI answers. The public careers page is the channel that matters for external visibility.

---

How Recruiting Teams Use CareerGPT Data to Prioritize Content Work

Content gaps on a career site are rarely isolated. Employers using CareerGPT typically find several recurring question clusters at once: interview process, benefits detail, location flexibility, degree requirements, and shift availability are among the most common, based on what candidates ask. The data does not require interpretation; it shows the exact question, the response given, and whether the candidate reached a job listing or left the conversation.

The workflow that follows from this is straightforward. Review the conversation records, filter for questions that returned partial or no answers, group them by topic, and assign the content update to the team member who owns that area. The recruitment marketing manager handles page copy. The TA lead verifies process detail. The updated content goes live, CareerGPT’s knowledge sources are refreshed, and the visibility check follows using SonicJobs Employer GPT Visibility, which enables employers to measure their visibility compared to competitors on ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

90% of CareerGPT conversations reached a relevant job result and 64% led to an application start. Those figures reflect conversations where candidates got useful answers. Content gaps reduce that rate. Addressing them directly improves the candidate experience on the career site and, as a secondary effect, improves the quality of content available for AI assistants to cite.

CareerGPT is live across a number of career sites, including InGen Biotech. The pattern of using conversation data to identify and close content gaps applies across sectors wherever candidates are asking questions that the career site currently cannot answer.

---

Platforms That Support Career Page Visibility in AI Answer Engines

TA leaders and recruitment marketing teams searching for platforms to improve career page visibility in AI answer engines are typically looking for two things: insight into what candidates are asking, and a way to verify whether their content is being cited in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. These are related but distinct problems.

CareerGPT addresses the first. It captures candidate question data on the career site itself, identifies content gaps, and gives recruiting teams a specific, reviewable record of where their content is falling short. This is the data that makes content improvement targeted rather than speculative.

The visibility check is a separate step, and it requires directly querying AI assistants with candidate-style questions to observe what they return. There is no platform that currently provides a real-time dashboard of how often your careers content is cited in ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude. Those assistants do not share that data. SonicJobs Employer GPT Visibility does that. Guide #5 in this series covers how to run those checks systematically.

What CareerGPT provides that other tools do not is the specific question to check. Without knowing which candidate questions are going unanswered, a visibility check covers general queries. With CareerGPT data, the check is targeted: take the top unanswered questions from the conversation record, update the page to address them, then ask each AI assistant the same question and observe what it cites. That is the loop this guide has walked through.

---

Best Practices for Closing Content Gaps and Maintaining Visibility

The following practices apply to recruiting teams working through a content improvement process using CareerGPT data.

Review conversation data on a regular cadence, not just at launch. Candidate questions shift as hiring priorities change, new roles open, and market conditions evolve. A question that was rare six months ago may now appear in every other conversation. Regular review keeps the content update process current.

Treat unanswered questions as a content queue. Each question that CareerGPT cannot answer fully is a line item for the content backlog. Prioritize by frequency: the questions asked most often have the highest impact when addressed.

Update the career site page first, then the CareerGPT knowledge sources. The public page is the asset that AI assistants can index and cite. Updating only the CareerGPT knowledge source addresses the on-site experience but does nothing for external visibility. The sequence matters.

Verify the update before running a visibility check. Confirm that the revised page is live and indexed before querying AI assistants. A check run against a page that has not yet been crawled will return the old version, or nothing.

Keep uploaded documents synchronized with the live page. CareerGPT can draw on PDFs and uploaded documents as knowledge sources for candidates on the site. When the public page is updated, the corresponding uploaded document should be updated to match. Inconsistency between sources produces inconsistent answers.

Log visibility check results over time. There is no automated tracking for citation frequency across AI assistants. A manual log of what each assistant returned, on what date, and for which query gives the team a baseline and a way to observe changes after a content update.

---

What This Loop Looks Like at Scale

A single content gap, like the interview-process question in the InGen Biotech example, takes one targeted update to address. At scale, a career site serving hundreds of open roles across multiple departments and locations will surface dozens of recurring question clusters at once. The process remains the same, but the coordination among teams becomes more important.

Teams that use CareerGPT data most effectively assign ownership clearly. One person reviews the conversation records and produces the content brief. Another verifies the accuracy of the detail with the relevant business unit. A third updates the page and the CareerGPT knowledge sources. The visibility check is the final step, not the first.

The content that results from this process is more specific, more candidate-facing, and more useful than content produced without that question data. It also reflects what candidates in that employer’s actual pipeline are asking, not what a generic careers page template assumed they would ask.

CareerGPT does not publish content. Its role in this loop is to surface the question and show that it went unanswered. The content decision, the accuracy check, and the page update belong to the employer’s team. That division keeps the employer in control of what is published and what candidates are told.

---

---

Last Updated: October 19, 2026 | By SonicJobs

Candidate questions reveal gaps in your careers content. SonicJobs explains how to review these questions, the answers candidates received, and the searches that returned nothing, so recruiting teams know exactly where to focus in 2026.

This guide covers what candidates ask before they apply, how to analyze that data by theme, what answer coverage means in practice, and how CareerGPT gives talent acquisition (TA) leaders visibility into conversations that other tools cannot surface.

---

The Gap Between What Candidates Need and What Career Sites Provide

A candidate arrives on your career site knowing the hours they can work, the benefits they need, and the experience they bring. What they often do not know is the job title to search for. Keyword search cannot bridge that gap. A candidate typing “weekend warehouse shift with health insurance” into a standard career site search bar will usually get zero results or a generic list sorted by date posted.

The same candidate, given the option to ask a direct question and follow up, will tell you exactly what they need. That conversation is also a record. Every question they ask, every search that returns no suitable roles, and every answer they receive is data that recruiting teams can act on. Most career sites collect none of it. CareerGPT by SonicJobs records it and makes it reviewable.

---

Why Candidate Questions Matter More Than Page Views in 2026

Page view data tells you where candidates went on your career site. It does not tell you what they were looking for or whether they found it. A candidate who opens four job descriptions and leaves without applying may have been searching for a specific shift pattern that none of those roles mentioned. The career site reported a visit; it did not report the unmet need.

Job search has shifted. Candidates now expect to describe what they want in full sentences, as they do with AI assistants in other parts of their lives. Many career sites have no job search of their own and simply redirect candidates to the applicant tracking system (ATS), even though a candidate who reaches the career site is already high intent. The question data that a conversational AI career agent generates is a direct record of that intent, specific, unfiltered, and available for review by the employer.

Unlike Google, which shares search terms and volumes through Search Console, AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini share no search data with employers. CareerGPT fills that gap specifically for the employer’s own career site.

---

What Candidates Are Actually Asking: Six Themes Employers Can Act On

When candidates can ask in their own words, the questions they ask cluster into recognizable themes. Understanding these themes helps TA and recruitment marketing teams prioritize content work. The examples below are anonymized and illustrative; they reflect the kinds of questions CareerGPT surfaces, not a ranked list of the most common queries across any employer.

Pay

Pay questions are among the most direct candidates ask, and among the most likely to go unanswered on a standard career site. Questions in this theme include things like: “What is the starting pay for warehouse associates in this area?” or “Is there a pay difference between day and night shifts?” Candidates asking these questions have a clear decision to make and need specific information to make it. A careers page that describes compensation as “competitive” gives them nothing to work with.

Schedules and Shifts

Schedule questions reflect real constraints. Candidates are not browsing; they are checking whether a role fits their life. Typical questions include: “Do you have part-time positions that start after 9am?” or “Are there four-day week options in the distribution centre roles?” When these questions go unanswered, candidates leave. When they appear repeatedly in CareerGPT conversation records, the employer has a clear signal that shift details need to be more prominent in job descriptions or on a dedicated page.

Benefits

Benefits questions often start broad and become specific through follow-up. A candidate might open with “What health insurance do you offer?” and follow up with “Does the plan cover dependants?” or “When does coverage start?” The follow-up is where most recruiting tools fail. A standard conversational AI agent returns the same benefits overview paragraph to every question in the thread. CareerGPT is built to answer the follow-up using the specific detail the employer has connected, or to tell the candidate that detail is not currently available.

Eligibility and Requirements

Eligibility questions are common from candidates who are not sure whether they qualify. Examples include: “Do I need a forklift licence before I apply, or is training provided?” or “Are there roles here that do not require a four-year degree?” These questions matter because they represent candidates who are interested but uncertain. Employers who answer them clearly in their content reduce a barrier that was never about candidate quality.

Growth and Development

Growth questions signal intent to stay. Candidates asking “Is there a path from shift supervisor to operations manager here?” or “Do you support professional certifications?” are already thinking beyond the role they are applying for. Career sites that address these questions engage candidates who are evaluating the employer as a long-term option, not just the immediate opening.

The Interview Process

Interview process questions are a consistent theme and a useful diagnostic. When candidates ask “How many rounds of interviews are there for this role?” or “Will the interview be in person or remote?” in volume, it usually means the employer has not described its process clearly. The SonicJobs brand guide notes that repeated questions about interview preparation show an employer needs a clearer explanation of its interview process. This is one of the most direct ways conversation data translates into a specific content action.

---

Understanding Answer Coverage

Answer coverage is a way of describing how well a career site’s connected knowledge sources respond to the questions candidates actually ask. When CareerGPT receives a question, it draws on the knowledge sources the employer has connected: the career site, the job feed, uploaded documents such as PDFs, and any approved external sources including LinkedIn, Glassdoor, Reddit, or the employer’s social media pages.

If those sources contain a clear, relevant answer, CareerGPT returns it with a source citation. If they do not contain enough information, CareerGPT tells the candidate so. Both outcomes are recorded. The employer can review which questions were answered well, which produced thin or partial responses, and which produced no relevant information at all.

High answer coverage across a theme, benefits, for example, means the connected sources address that topic in enough detail for candidates to make decisions. Low coverage in the same theme means candidates are asking questions the career site cannot currently answer. That gap is not a data curiosity; it is a content brief.

Employers manage coverage by reviewing conversation records, identifying which questions fell outside the connected knowledge, and then adding that information. This can be done by updating the career site, uploading a document, or connecting an additional approved source. The employer controls what information CareerGPT has access to at all times.

---

How Employers Review Candidate Questions in CareerGPT

CareerGPT records each candidate question, the response it gave, the sources it cited, and the activity that followed within that conversation: which jobs the candidate viewed and where an application was started. Employers can review and export this data.

The review process is not automated interpretation. It is access to the actual conversation record. A TA leader or recruitment marketing manager can read the specific questions candidates asked, in the order they asked them, alongside the answers CareerGPT provided. This is meaningfully different from a summary dashboard that reports only aggregate counts. The actual phrasing of a question often carries information that a category label loses.

For example, two questions may both be categorised under “benefits” but carry different implications. “Do you offer dental?” is a coverage question. “Is the dental plan the same for full-time and part-time employees?” is a detail question that reveals a specific concern about employment status. Acting on the first might mean adding a benefits summary page. Acting on the second might mean clarifying eligibility conditions in the benefits documentation.

SonicJobs data shows that competitors’ processes for reviewing and approving candidate questions and answers usually take 6-9 months, but with CareerGPT, employers can simply whitelist data sources like company career sites and Glassdoor pages, reducing the process to days. CareerGPT draws answers from knowledge sources the employer already controls, which means the information is already approved and current. The conversation record shows employers where that existing information is working and where it is not.

---

Reading Unsuccessful Searches as a Recruiting Signal

Not every candidate search returns a matching role. When a search returns no suitable jobs, CareerGPT tells the candidate. That exchange is also recorded. Unsuccessful searches are a different kind of signal from unanswered questions, and they are worth reading separately.

An unsuccessful search might mean the employer has no roles matching the candidate’s requirements. It might also mean the employer does have matching roles but the job feed does not surface them for that particular combination of criteria. Or it might mean a role exists but the description does not contain the language the candidate used. Each of these has a different resolution.

A pattern of unsuccessful searches for a specific role type in a specific location is an indication that supply and demand in that area need attention. A pattern of unsuccessful searches for a combination of requirements, such as part-time and remote in a particular function, may reflect a genuine gap in the employer’s offering or a gap in how existing flexibility is described. Employers use this data to investigate what those candidates are looking for and to decide whether a content change, a posting change, or a hiring decision is the right response.

---

What to Look for in a Conversational AI Career Agent for Candidate Insight

TA leaders evaluating tools for candidate question insight should expect a few specific capabilities. The questions below are worth asking of any platform in this category.

Access to the Full Conversation Record

Aggregate metrics show volume. The conversation record shows intent. A tool that provides only summary counts of question categories gives the employer less to act on than one that lets the team read actual questions and responses. CareerGPT makes the full conversation record reviewable and exportable.

Answers Drawn from Employer-Approved Sources

The quality of the answers candidates receive determines whether the insight data is trustworthy. If a career agent draws answers from sources the employer has not approved or cannot verify, the conversation record reflects misinformation as well as genuine candidate interest. CareerGPT answers from knowledge sources the employer connects and controls. Approved external sources, including LinkedIn, Glassdoor, Reddit, and the employer’s YouTube and social media pages, can be connected alongside the career site and job feed. Candidate conversations are not shared with any external AI lab.

Visibility into Searches with No Results

A tool that only records answered questions misses a significant share of the signal. Unsuccessful searches are where genuine unmet need is most visible. The employer needs to know not just what candidates asked but what they searched for and did not find.

No Disruption to the Existing Application Journey

A career agent that requires an ATS migration or a career site rebuild creates a cost that can delay deployment by months. CareerGPT sits on the employer’s existing career site without replacing it. Adding the script takes minutes; the full deployment can go live in days once the job feed, content, and approvals are in place. The candidate continues through the employer’s existing application process when they are ready to apply.

Multilingual Support

Candidate populations are rarely monolingual, particularly for employers with distributed workforces. CareerGPT is available across countries and languages, including Spanish, French, German, Mandarin, and Hindi. Job descriptions remain in the language the employer published them in.

---

How TA Teams and Recruitment Marketers Use CareerGPT Insight

The employers who get the most from CareerGPT’s conversation data use it as a standing input to content decisions, not a one-time audit. Below are the ways recruiting teams apply it in practice.

Prioritising content updates: When the same question about a specific benefit appears across multiple conversations with thin or no coverage, that benefit page is next in the content queue. The question data gives content teams a ranked list of gaps without requiring a separate research exercise.

Adjusting suggested questions: CareerGPT can be configured to show suggested starting questions when a candidate opens it. Employers update these to reflect what candidates are actually asking. If a significant share of conversations are opening with shift-related questions, a suggested question about shift availability reduces friction for the next candidate with the same need.

Reviewing role-level detail: Candidates often ask follow-up questions about a specific job after opening it in CareerGPT. If those follow-ups are consistently about the same gap (say, training requirements for a warehouse role), the job description for that role needs more detail. The conversation record connects the content gap directly to the posting.

Monitoring new searches after a posting goes live: When a new role is posted, the first wave of candidate questions about it is a useful early indicator of what the job description is missing. Employers can review those conversations within days of the posting and update the description before the main application volume arrives.

Understanding candidate interest in locations and role types: Repeated unsuccessful searches for a role type in a specific city or region are a signal that recruiting activity in that area may need to increase, or that existing roles in that area need more visible promotion.

Informing recruitment marketing decisions: Recruitment marketing teams use question themes to identify what content candidates need before they reach the application. If candidates on the career site are consistently asking about culture and growth, those themes are underserved in current marketing content.

90% of CareerGPT conversations reached a relevant job result, and 64% led to an application start. The conversation record behind those figures is what enables the content and configuration decisions that sustain them.

---

Best Practices for Reading and Acting on Candidate Questions

Conversation data is only useful if someone reviews it regularly and connects what they find to a specific action. The following practices reflect how recruiting teams get consistent value from CareerGPT’s insight layer.

Review on a fixed cadence, not just when something looks wrong. A monthly or fortnightly review of conversation records gives teams a baseline. Changes in question volume by theme are visible against that baseline. A sudden increase in interview process questions, for example, is more informative when you know what the normal level looks like.

Read the question alongside the answer, not separately. An unanswered question and a poorly answered question look the same in aggregate but require different responses. Reading the actual answer CareerGPT provided shows whether the issue is missing content or content that exists but is not clearly written.

Separate unsuccessful searches from unanswered questions in your review. These are different problems. An unanswered question means the content exists elsewhere but is not connected. An unsuccessful search may mean no role exists, or that the role exists but is described differently. Treating them the same leads to content updates that do not address the real issue.

Track question themes alongside hiring priorities. If a role is hard to fill, the conversation record for that role type is worth examining specifically. Candidates who were interested but left without applying often left a question behind that explains why.

Use uploaded documents to fill gaps quickly. When a content gap is identified and updating the career site will take time, an uploaded PDF can connect that information to CareerGPT immediately. Employers share information with candidates through uploaded documents that they have not yet published, or add material without waiting on a website update cycle.

Connect question patterns to career site content decisions. Turning insight into content changes is where the value compounds. Guide #18 in the SonicJobs guide series covers how to take the patterns identified in CareerGPT conversation records and translate them directly into career site content improvements.

---

How CareerGPT Gives Employers Visibility Other Tools Cannot Provide

CareerGPT sits on the employer’s existing career site as a floating widget or embedded in the search bar. It requires no career site rebuild and no ATS migration. Candidates open it, describe what they are looking for, ask questions about specific roles, and continue through the employer’s existing application process when they are ready. At Johns Hopkins Medicine, CareerGPT is live and active within that existing career infrastructure.

The insight it generates is specific to the employer’s own candidates on the employer’s own site. No other tool currently provides this. Google Search Console shows what terms bring candidates to the site from search; it does not show what candidates asked once they arrived or which of those questions went unanswered. AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini share no search data with employers at all. CareerGPT provides a conversation record that is fully within the employer’s control, drawn from sources the employer has approved, and exportable for use by the recruiting team.

For TA leaders who want to know what candidates are asking before they apply, and where the career site is failing to answer them, that record is the starting point. For recruitment marketing teams, it is a brief for the content that will close the gap.

---

---